Get In Touch

Secretly recorded spouse calls now evidence, says Supreme Court!

    Share on

The Supreme Court on Monday, July 14, 2025, ruled that secretly recorded telephonic conversations between spouses are admissible evidence in matrimonial cases .

A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma overturned a Punjab & Haryana High Court ruling that deemed such recordings a privacy violation, saying Section 122 of the Evidence Act provides an exception in legal disputes between spouses. The Court highlighted that snooping itself reflects a marriage's breakdown, stating: “If the marriage has reached a stage where spouses are actively snooping on each other, that is in itself a symptom of a broken relationship”.

Acknowledging privacy rights under Article 21, the Court said they aren’t absolute and must be balanced against the right to a fair trial.

The decision allows family courts to consider covert recordings in divorce or cruelty cases, setting a new precedent in family law while sidelining concerns that it could encourage marital spying.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Why are Delhi’s low income families paying 15% of their income for water?

Why are Delhi’s low income families paying 15% of their...

A Greenpeace survey shows one-third of low-income Delhi families spend up to 15% of earnings...
New secret Railway portal? For MPs only!

New secret Railway portal? For MPs only!

Indian Railways to develop exclusive portal for sitting and former MPs, enabling them to book/cancel...
UPSC integrity stands, fake certificates demand urgent scrutiny!

UPSC integrity stands, fake certificates demand urgent scrutiny!

Ex-Uttarakhand DGP warns that fake EWS and disability certificates in UPSC are undermining trust. He...
Justice Deferred? SC refuses to expand POSH Act to Political Workers.

Justice Deferred? SC refuses to expand POSH Act to Political...

SC allows advocate Yogamaya MG to withdraw PIL seeking inclusion of women political workers under...
Don't criminalise consensual teen Sex, Says Indira Jaising!

Don't criminalise consensual teen Sex, Says Indira Jaising!

Senior advocate Indira Jaising urges SC to exclude consensual sexual activity between adolescents aged 16‑18...
Supreme Court: Think before you post, Not just after!

Supreme Court: Think before you post, Not just after!

Supreme Court emphasizes value of free speech, urges self‑restraint and internal mechanisms over censorship as...

Login

Don’t you have an account ?

Register